The breach in security was the only
concern of a congressional hearing that followed the incident at Oak Ridge. International law that prohibits the production of weapons
resulting in indiscriminatory casualties was not addressed. Neither was it in the courts, which prohibited
any evidence backing the contention or the motives of the protestors.
A question that surrounded the trials
and stiff sentences for the protestors was also posed to the panel that
followed the screening of the film. Does “blind justice” rule out any
consideration of the morality behind creating, stockpiling, and updating
weapons that could annihilate Earth? The courts said “yes,” as did the lawyer
on the panel who himself agreed that nuclear weapons should not exist. He asked
if it was possible to maintain any sense of order if the morality of a law or
action could be argued in a trial situation.
An audience member suggested that perhaps our justice system needs a
“little chaos” to raise awareness about its shortcomings.
When asked if she thought that
their act of civil disobedience had any impact, Sister Meghan said that she did
not know, but perhaps its impact was yet to come. What do you think? Is it time for another protest action?
No comments:
Post a Comment